• About Us
  • Editorial Team
  • Cyber ​​Media Guidelines
  • Karir
  • Kontak
Thursday, June 4, 2026
AsiaToday.id
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • GREEN ENERGY
  • TRAVEL
  • EVENT
  • SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT
  • CORPORATION
  • FORUM
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • GREEN ENERGY
  • TRAVEL
  • EVENT
  • SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT
  • CORPORATION
  • FORUM
No Result
View All Result
AsiaToday.id
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Myanmar Fights Back at the World Court: Genocide Verdict Would ‘Scar a Nation Forever’

by Editor Asiatoday
January 17, 2026
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Myanmar Fights Back at the World Court: Genocide Verdict Would ‘Scar a Nation Forever’

Ko Ko Hlaing, Agent of Myanmar, addresses judges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. UN Photo

ASIATODAY.ID, THE HAGUE – Myanmar on Friday launched its defence at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, forcefully rejecting allegations that it committed genocide against the Rohingya minority.

Addressing judges during public hearings, Myanmar argued that the case brought by The Gambia is built on what it described as “unsubstantiated and partisan allegations,” as proceedings continued in a landmark test of the Genocide Convention.

Speaking on behalf of the State, Ko Ko Hlaing, Myanmar’s Agent before the Court, said the country fully recognizes the importance of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, but categorically denies breaching its obligations under international law.

RelatedPosts

Corruption Scandal Hits Indonesia’s Free Meals Program as Former Nutrition Chiefs Are Jailed

Indonesian Nickel Downstreaming: IPIP Pomalaa Urged to Avoid IMIP and IWIP Pitfalls

Indonesia Accelerates OECD Membership Bid and Ratification of I-EU CEPA

“A finding of genocide would leave an indelible stain on my country and its people,” Mr. Hlaing told the Court, describing the hearings as “of fundamental importance to Myanmar’s reputation and future.”

He accused The Gambia of relying on what he called rudimentary and politically motivated material, including reports produced by a UN fact-finding mission, arguing that these documents were “neither reliable nor objective” and amounted to “a condemnation without trial.”

Myanmar: Counter-Terrorism, Not Genocide

Myanmar also rejected claims that its military’s so-called “clearance operations” in northern Rakhine State in 2016 and 2017 were carried out with genocidal intent.

Instead, it maintained that the operations were legitimate counter-terrorism measures launched in response to attacks by armed groups.

“Obviously, Myanmar was not obliged to remain idle and allow terrorists to operate freely in northern Rakhine State,” Mr. Hlaing told the judges, while acknowledging that civilians were killed and that large numbers of people fled to Bangladesh as a result of the violence.

He further disputed allegations that Myanmar denies the existence or rights of the Muslim population in northern Rakhine, arguing that issues of citizenship, terminology and identity “have nothing to do with genocide.”

Myanmar said it has complied with all procedural orders issued by the Court, including the provisional measures imposed in January 2020, and has submitted regular reports outlining steps taken in response.

The government also reiterated its commitment to the repatriation of displaced persons from Bangladesh, citing bilateral agreements with Dhaka and pointing to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters.

The Case Before the World Court

The case originates from an application filed by The Gambia in November 2019, accusing Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention through acts allegedly committed during military operations in Rakhine State.

Those operations escalated in 2017 and, according to UN investigations, involved widespread killings, sexual violence and the burning of villages, forcing more than 700,000 Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh. Nearly one million Rohingya continue to live as refugees there.

The current hearings, which will run through late January, mark the first time the ICJ is examining the merits of the case.

A final judgment—expected months after the hearings conclude—will be legally binding and could carry far-reaching consequences for international accountability in cases of alleged genocide. (AT Network)

Follow Us at Google News and WA Channel

Tags: GenocideInternational Court of JusticeMyanmar
No Result
View All Result

Terbaru

  • Corruption Scandal Hits Indonesia’s Free Meals Program as Former Nutrition Chiefs Are Jailed
  • Indonesian Nickel Downstreaming: IPIP Pomalaa Urged to Avoid IMIP and IWIP Pitfalls
  • Securing Carbon Credits for Smallholder Farmers
  • Indonesia Accelerates OECD Membership Bid and Ratification of I-EU CEPA
  • Indonesia Deepens Mineral Cooperation with China Amid Global Race for Critical Resources
  • About Us
  • Editorial Team
  • Cyber ​​Media Guidelines
  • Karir
  • Kontak

© 2022 Asiatoday.id - Asiatoday Network.

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • GREEN ENERGY
  • TRAVEL
  • EVENT
  • SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT
  • CORPORATION
  • FORUM

© 2022 Asiatoday.id - Asiatoday Network.